Do you name your assemblies consistently (<CompanyName>.<ComponentName>)?
  v3.0 Posted at 20/10/2010 7:56 PM by System Account
Assembly names should reflect the the functionality that it provides. For example,

contains all the classes that deal with inputs and outputs. As a general rule of thumb your assemblies should be named as follows:

<CompanyName>.<ComponentName> (e.g. SSW.Framework)

This allows a developer to know who developed the assembly and give the developer a general idea of what the assembly can be used for.

Related rules

    Do you feel this rule needs an update?

    If you want to be notified when this rule is updated, please enter your email address: